1924 Quarter Error List with Pictures
Two eagles overlap on the back of a remarkable 1924 quarter. CONECA’s Errorscope reports that this double-struck coin sold for $13,800 in November 2010.
The same coin also has a front-side depression from a second blank, showing how one mistake can leave several clues. This 1924 quarter error guide covers estimated values from $30 to $60,000.
Explore the examples below, from small surface flakes to dramatic repeated strikes.
1. 1924 Standing Liberty Quarter Lamination
A piece of the coin’s own surface may peel up instead of lying flat. This separation within the metal is called lamination.
Year guides report the feature on 1924-D and 1924-S quarters. A weak layer in the original silver alloy can split, leaving an attached flap or an exposed patch.
The flap may carry part of the struck design. If it separates earlier, the newly exposed surface can receive the design during striking.
That difference helps explain why laminations do not all look alike. The visible split should be distinguished from a scratch, a dent, or scattered corrosion pits.
Estimated Value
Estimate $30 to $500 for ordinary genuine 1924 laminations, depending on the size, visibility, and coin condition. A tiny flake on a heavily worn quarter belongs near the bottom.
A dealer offered a different-year 1919 example graded AU50, with light wear, at $225. That asking price provides context rather than a recorded 1924 sale.
An attached flap crossing recognizable design can attract more interest. Avoid paying extra for roughness that cannot be separated from corrosion or damage.
How to Identify
Photograph the split before moving the coin more than necessary. If a flap is loose, leave it attached rather than testing whether it will lift farther.
Follow the design across the affected area and compare the flap with the surface beneath it. Detail stamped onto the flap tells a different story from detail formed inside a patch where metal was already missing.
Check whether the separation runs along a thin layer or drops into a deep impact crater. Side lighting helps reveal that boundary without scraping the surface.
A loose coin may be lighter if silver has fallen away, but an attached flap need not change its weight. Preserve both face photographs so an expert can connect the split with the original coin design.
2. 1924 Standing Liberty Quarter Clashed Dies and the Clashed E
Parts of the eagle can appear among Liberty’s folds after the striking tools hit each other without a blank between them. Those tools, called dies, can transfer small pieces of their designs.
The 1924-S clash listing describes eagle-tail traces extending from the gown left of Liberty’s right elbow. Traces from her gown and right leg can appear on the back.
The Clashed E name refers to an extra letter outline linked to the opposite inscription. Philadelphia year reports describe a separate example, so the San Francisco pattern should not be assigned to every coin.
Estimated Value
An estimated $50 to $600 covers ordinary worn through modestly unworn examples with recognizable clash marks. Clear connected shapes attract more interest than a single faint line.
A seller listed a 1924-S Clashed E coin described as Fine at $59. That is a retail listing, not a verified auction payment.
Compare the actual transferred pattern and wear before using the higher estimate. An unusually well-preserved coin can also have substantial value independent of its clash marks.
How to Identify
Choose the correct mint before matching the clash: the detailed catalog example is a 1924-S. Its front-side starting point is the gown just left of Liberty’s right elbow, where eagle-tail traces emerge.
Compare those marks with the eagle’s shape, then examine the back for corresponding gown and leg traces. Keep the normal relationship between the two faces fixed instead of rotating a comparison image until one line fits.
A claimed Philadelphia Clashed E needs photographs of that separate variety rather than the San Francisco pattern. In either case, inspect the mark for cut grooves or displaced edges from scratches, and retain full-face views to show where each outline belongs.
3. 1924 Standing Liberty Quarter Clipped Blank
A 1924-D quarter is listed as having a 7% clip and a PCGS AU53 grade. That grade describes light circulation wear.
The clip means a portion of the original disk was missing before the coin was struck. A cutting machine can produce such a disk when it overlaps a previous hole or the edge of the metal strip.
The surviving blank still receives the quarter design. Its rim can form differently beside the missing area.
The report gives the clip size without a precise clock position. The complete coin’s outline is needed to understand that individual gap.
Estimated Value
Allow an estimated $100 to $1,200 for a genuine clipped 1924 Standing Liberty quarter across ordinary circulated and attractive unworn examples. The reported AU53 coin sits between heavily worn pieces and coins with no wear.
Collectors assess the gap together with the date, mint letter, and remaining design. A clear original clip is more appealing than a damaged edge with an uncertain origin.
A premium should depend on convincing mint-made features and preservation, not simply the percentage in a listing.
How to Identify
On the reported Denver coin, locate the D on the front near the left side of the pedestal. Keep it and the date visible in the same set of photographs as the missing section.
Compare the gap from both faces and from the edge. Later cutting can leave sharp sheared metal or tool marks that an overhead view hides.
Examine how the raised rim approaches each end of the opening. Genuine clips can show weakened nearby detail and sometimes a weaker rim on the opposite side.
For a loose example, weigh it to check whether the missing area fits a reduced weight from the normal 6.25 grams. The weight and rim evidence must agree; neither a low reading nor the seller’s percentage proves a mint-made clip alone.
4. 1924 Standing Liberty Quarter Struck Through Material
A coin can receive an incomplete image when material gets between the die and the blank. The material blocks contact and leaves a depression or an area of weak detail.
The CHS Basel November 2022 catalog lists a 1924 Standing Liberty quarter with a struck-through error and NGC certification. The description does not establish a particular object or affected face.
The shape of the impression matters. A narrow groove, a woven pattern, and a soft patch would point toward different kinds of obstruction.
Those features belong to the individual coin. The category name alone does not supply them.
Estimated Value
Estimate $150 to $2,000 for an authenticated 1924 struck-through quarter, with size, clarity, and condition setting the level. A minor recess on a worn piece belongs below a dramatic, recognizable impression.
A 1938-S Washington quarter struck through string sold for $312 in June 2025. It offers a recent silver-quarter comparison, but its different design and identified object matter.
The 1924 catalog entry should be assessed from its own impression rather than assigned the later coin’s appearance or grade.
How to Identify
A struck-through label does not identify the object by itself, so begin by describing the actual shape you can see. Decide whether the surface has a narrow recess, a broad weak patch, or material still attached.
Follow the boundary into surrounding letters and open areas to see where contact was interrupted. Sharp scraping lines through already formed detail or metal pushed aside by an impact suggest a later injury instead.
Check the opposite face and nearby high points for additional damage or broad circulation wear. Preserve any remaining material and keep the complete certified label with your photographs, allowing an expert to match the visible feature to the coin’s own description.
5. 1924 Standing Liberty Quarter Off-Center Strike
Part of the date runs beyond the edge on a documented 1924-S quarter struck 8–10% off center. The shift is toward six o’clock, or the bottom of the upright coin.
Heritage described the ANACS XF45 example as lightly worn, with a sharp head and shield rivets. Those preserved details help show that the design was displaced during striking.
A different example is labeled (1924)-S, struck 15% off center and graded NGC MS64+ Full Head. Full Head means that Liberty’s head details are sharply formed.
The parentheses identify an assigned year rather than promising a complete visible date.
Estimated Value
The 8–10% off-center coin sold at Heritage for $3,840 in January 2023. The separate 15% example brought $10,200 in the July 2022 Misfits Collection sale.
An estimated $3,500 to $15,000 covers coins resembling these documented examples. The higher-grade piece combines greater displacement with attractive unworn surfaces and sharp head detail.
These are two different coins. Do not attach the stronger price to the lightly worn example merely because both are attributed to the same year.
How to Identify
Study the date together with the coin’s outer outline. On the 8–10% example, part of the date extends off the metal at the bottom rather than disappearing only through wear.
Compare that boundary on both faces to see how the same disk sat outside the centered striking position. A complete design inside an expanded border would call for a broadstrike comparison instead.
The 15% coin has its own label and photographs, so preserve the parentheses around its year. Do not transfer the other coin’s six-o’clock direction or exact date visibility to it.
Keep the S and surviving head detail in view when comparing the two examples. Their separate surfaces, amount of wear, and displaced outlines should remain separate in any description or valuation.
6. 1924 Standing Liberty Quarter Double Strike with a Front Indent
Two eagles overlap on the back of this double-struck 1924 quarter. Its second strike landed about 20% off center toward eleven to twelve o’clock.
During that second blow, another blank lay against the front. It pressed a depression, called an indent, into the already struck coin.
The front design inside that area became flatter and stretched, but its major elements remained visible. It is not an entirely blank face.
The documented coin was graded AU55 by ANACS, meaning only light wear. Its overlapping eagles and front depression belong to one combined minting accident, not two separate coins.
Estimated Value
CONECA’s Errorscope reports a $13,800 sale at Bowers & Merena in November 2010. A later published description assigns a $60,000 value; that figure is an appraisal, not another recorded sale.
An estimated $12,000 to $60,000 reflects the unusual combination and the distance between those historical price references. The two clear eagles make the repeated strike especially easy to appreciate.
Value the complete coin once. The front indent does not add a second independent coin price to the double strike.
How to Identify
Look at the entire back before studying small details: two recognizable eagles occupy different positions on this coin. Trace each eagle into adjoining features to establish two strikes, rather than relying on a few doubled letter edges.
The second position lies roughly 20% off center toward the top, around eleven to twelve o’clock. Ordinary doubled dies cannot move a complete eagle that far.
The front tells the rest of the story. Another blank pressed into it during the second strike, leaving a depression with earlier design flattened and stretched inside.
Compare that depressed area with the documented coin while keeping its remaining major design visible. Sunken reversed lettering would point to contact with a struck coin, a different feature from the plain-blank indent described here.
Conclusion
The estimated $30 to $60,000 range reflects very different mistakes, not a single premium for an unusual mark. The double-struck coin combines two eagles and a front depression, while the off-center examples retain different amounts of their dates.
Compare complete photographs before choosing a value. Keep each coin’s mint, condition, and remaining design together, and avoid treating two features on one coin as two separate prices.